51³Ô¹Ï

Plans for Horizon Europe successor ¡®still lack clarity¡¯

Confirmation of self-standing FP10 welcomed ¨C but budget questions still to be answered, say umbrella bodies

May 27, 2025
EU flags in Brussels, Belgium
Source: iStock/Teka77

The European Commission?has been urged to offer more ¡°clarity¡± on the successor to Horizon Europe after confirming it will be a self-standing programme, with questions about its connection to a proposed ¡°European Competitiveness Fund¡±?and the nature of its budget still unanswered.

Last week, Commission president Ursula von der Leyen confirmed that the next European Union research funding programme, currently known as Framework Programme 10 (FP10), would ¡°stay a self-standing programme¡±, quelling mounting concerns across the sector that it would be folded into the new competitiveness fund.

In a published on 27 May, however, the League of European Research Universities (Leru) and the Guild of European Research-Intensive Universities said ¡°further clarity is needed¡± on the future of FP10.

Noting von der Leyen¡¯s comment that the next framework programme will be ¡°tightly connected¡± to the proposed competitiveness fund, Leru and the Guild called for ¡°clarity on what this connection entails and how it will be implemented¡±.

51³Ô¹Ï

ADVERTISEMENT

The umbrella bodies also urged the Commission to address several ¡°key priorities¡± they highlighted in published earlier this year, which was signed by more than 200 university leaders across Europe.

The next framework programme, they said, should have a ¡°ring-fenced budget of at least €200 billion¡±, while ¡°proven successes¡± including the Marie Sk?odowska-Curie Actions (MSCA), which fund knowledge exchange, training and career development, should receive greater investment.

51³Ô¹Ï

ADVERTISEMENT

Leru and The Guild called for the expansion of the European Research Council and the reform of the European Innovation Council, asking the Commission to ensure their ¡°bottom-up nature and autonomy¡±.

More support should be provided for research and innovation collaboration ¡°across sectors, borders and disciplines¡± with a focus on ¡°pressing global challenges¡±, the university groups said, while partnerships with ¡°closely associated countries¡± should be strengthened to ensure ¡°enhanced global competitiveness¡±.

In a statement, Leru secretary general Kurt Deketelaere said the sector was ¡°grateful and partially reassured ¨C for now¡± in the wake of von der Leyen¡¯s comments. ¡°The message from the European R&I community is loud and clear: FP10 and the European Competitiveness Fund must be complementary, with distinct legal frameworks and budgets,¡± he continued.

¡°We will not accept a token FP10 ¨C one designed merely to silence researchers, stripped of meaningful content or funding.¡±

51³Ô¹Ï

ADVERTISEMENT

Guild secretary-general Jan Palmowski said the next framework programme ¡°must be built on excellence, with a predictable, ring-fenced budget¡±, adding: ¡°It must build on its proven strengths to invest in bottom-up, curiosity-driven research, coupled with effective instruments to benefit society ¨C and with appropriate support for private investment.¡±

¡°Europe¡¯s universities and their leaders are united in their commitment to Europe¡¯s future,¡± Palmowski said. ¡°We urge Europe¡¯s political leaders to listen¡±.

emily.dixon@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Discussions about the shape of the next framework programme, due to begin in 2028, are already under way. But the European Commission¡¯s deafening silence is stoking fears that it wants to refocus research funding on short-term industrial competitiveness. Emily Dixon reports

1 April

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT