51勛圖

Could REF pause lead to Trump-style diversity crackdown?

Three-month review of Research Excellence Framework could trigger more radical rethink on institutional priorities and spending, sector figures warn

Published on
September 12, 2025
Last updated
September 12, 2025
Closeup of traffic lights showing orange color
Source: iStock/franconiaphoto

Pausing the Research Excellence Framework (REF) amid concerns over its controversial environment section could signal the start of more fundamental shift away from an institutional focus on equality, diversity and inclusion (EDI) initiatives, say experts.

They warned that a Trump-style diversity spending purge should not be ruled out.

The three-month review of REF 2029, which was announced by science minister Lord Vallance at last week*s Universities UK conference, has been widely viewed as marking a fundamental shift in how the exercise*s people, culture and environment (PCE) section will influence the allocation of ?2 billion in quality-related funding awarded annually to universities.

While some expect the PCE*s weighting, which was due to increase to the same as impact at 25 per cent, to be downgraded, others believe more radical action is on the cards. That could include the scrapping of PCE altogether, with research culture becoming a regulatory matter in which universities are required to hit minimum standards as a condition of funding.

51勛圖

ADVERTISEMENT

※The REF shapes ?20 billion of public spending so it has to align with the country*s priorities. Making sure universities are a happier place 每 which is what research culture boils down to 每 is not on the government*s list of priorities,§ said one sector figure to 51勛圖.

John Womersley, former chief executive of the Science and Technology Facilities Council, said the REF*s delay is likely to go beyond technocratic concerns about the feasibility of as-yet-announced PCE metrics.

51勛圖

ADVERTISEMENT

※Though 2029 seems like a really long way off, it*s not in REF terms; if you start working your way back, then universities will need to start putting together some kind of a dry run for the REF this year but they are completely in the dark on PCE,§ he said about the behind-the-scenes challenges.

※There seems to be a bigger concern about the drift into prioritising diversity metrics over excellence. Ministers might have looked over the Atlantic and what happened over there 每 with universities caricatured as having people in the DEI office rather than professors 每 and thought: &Do you want that here 每 and the backlash too?*§ continued Womersley.

※In opposition, Labour could be loud in their support for progressive causes. ?But now they are in government they are having to think more carefully. ?We saw this with Wes Streeting backing away from puberty blockers and gender-affirming care. ?And for the universities too 每 when it was the Tories complaining about being too woke it was easy to push back, but when Labour cabinet ministers are raising concerns then it is harder to ignore,§ he said.

The PCE decision might represent important recognition by UK Research and Innovation and universities that this priority does not command political support, Womersley said.

51勛圖

ADVERTISEMENT

※Universities have lots of support but it is a very thin type of support; vice-chancellors are increasingly conscious of the limits of their social pact with the public and realise more EDI focus might stretch the elastic on this. There is not the willingness to indulge things they did a year or two ago,§ he said.

Ian Pace, professor of music, culture and society at City St George*s, University of London, said the ※principles of equality of opportunity, encouraging diverse students and staff to participate in academia§ should remain vital to academia but there are growing questions about EDI and the bloated layers of administration that have grown around it§.

※They have come to mean something else, a form of ideological policing and gatekeeping from advocates of critical social justice, which prioritise identity and &lived experience* over research excellence and other forms of academic prowess,§ said Pace, founding member and secretary of the London Universities* Council for Academic Freedom.

Recent stories about job adverts requiring applicants to explicitly commit to principles, which were withdrawn because they contradicted Office for Students advice, underlined how EDI had assumed an outsized influence in university life, continued Pace. ※But many appointments 每 some with highly politicised job titles 每 have already been made across the sector on this basis.§

51勛圖

ADVERTISEMENT

※The proposed re-weighting of the REF regarding PCE constituted a reflection of a sector in which some have won advancement because of ideological conformity rather than more dispassionately measured excellence 每 the 25 per cent weighting was an atrocious proposal and I am glad it is being reconsidered.§

Asked whether the UK government might seek to scale back EDI spending similar to the purge seen in America under Trump, he added: ※The sort of draconian reaction we have seen in the US under Trump would not be a positive move here but it is not unthinkable if there is a future government in which Reform plays a major role.§

51勛圖

ADVERTISEMENT

jack.grove@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

A sector described by a leading party figure as a &conveyor belt for communism* is understandably wary of Nigel Farage*s latest right-wing populist project. But Reform UK persistently tops opinion polls. And the party*s annual conference suggests universities have a lot of ground to make up with it. Patrick Jack reports

11 September

Reader's comments (8)

There should not really have been or should be any need for any Trump-style anything here. Things never should have been allowed by professional people, paid to serve the community, to get to this stage in the long-standing formulation and application of a methodology for assessing research excellence in the UK HE system. What we have ended up with, in this instance as in so many others, is yet another example of the application of the System of Dr Tarr and Professor Fether.
So now at this very late stage there is an emergency 3 month pause to rethink policies that have been years in the formulation? It seems that this exercise is constantly undergoing major rethinks originating in the minds of god knows who. Surely by now we should have a procedure fit for purpose? Is it really too much to ask? The damn thing costs enough and takes up so much of our time. So why not change it all again just as we're losing tens of thousands of colleagues from the sector! It's very difficult to have much if any confidence in it now.
I think REF stopped being for for purpose many years ago. It has become a bureaucratic institution with its own momentum and raison d'那tre now, trundling blithely along like the car of Juggernaut crushing the bodies of academics thrown under its wheels. It mainly serves to perpetuate its own bureaucracy now with its armies of administrators, panel members, sub panel members. It is subject to frequent substantive add ons and bolts ons to take cognisance of modish trends in HE policy (Impact, EDI etc) and subsequently needs its imperfections and unintended consequences to be radically re-corrected in ad hoc ways, and this is only the latest instalment. I suppose at some level it probably serves some deeper functionalist purpose but as a menas of assessing research quality, well i don't think anyone believes that any more do they?
I do think you are right here. It's a bureaucracy now and functions in its own interests and not for its nominal purpose. It serves to provide work, jobs, career prospects, promotions, status, power and influence, external earnings (that should be investigated in my view), etc etc for those that work within it, which is why it is defended (from those who benfit from it) and continues to grow bigger and more expensive and is virtually unstoppable and practically uncontrollable. We know from Weber et al that that is what bureaucracies do. It would take a minister with specialist knowledge and a great deal of intellectual and ethical courage to get it back on the right track working as a genuine process of research quality assessment. But they largely have more pressing matters on theor minds at the moment I guess.
I*m intrigued by the comment that VCs know there are limits to EDI commitments and they*re backing away from it. Seems to me they*re doubling or tripling down, every email I get internally is framed in this stuff.
Good to know they are growing a spine at last, now the wind is blowing in a contrary direction. Look at all the "we must engage with Regorm UK", material on here suddenly.
new
Oh now they get worried? Where have they been for the last 5 years or so?
Well to be honest faced with this colossal waste of taxpayers' money you tend to start thinking maybe Trump and Farage and that crowd have a point. We have no-one to blame but ourselves in my view.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT