Disagreeing with Meg Barker's position on sexually predatory lecturers is one thing, but an ad hominem attack is objectionable. Saying, in effect, that she had it coming because of her behaviour is even worse.
Shame on Peter Leapman, and shame on The Times Higher for publishing his letter.
Doug Clow
Milton Keynes
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to 啦晨楚＊莽 university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?
Please or to read this article.