Mike Robinson, national officer for higher education at the Unite union, claimed today that there was anecdotal evidence of institutions worried they had acted in concert by having discussions about the issue.
Giving evidence to the Business, Innovation and Skills Committees inquiry into the governments funding reforms, Mr Robinson said the decision by most institutions to charge 瞿9,000 was not accidental.
The level of fee setting worries my union, he said. The number of institutions that are going at the 瞿9,000 level we dont think is an accident, we think it is deliberate. Whether its planned between them is our concern and we think that is something that you need to look at.
He added: We are looking at institutions that havent taken a very transparent view about how they set their fees.
51勛圖
After the hearing, Mr Robinson said the Office of Fair Trading would have to investigate if specific evidence of collusion emerged.
The fee increases are a runaway train with an enormous financial crash at the end that the public purse will have to pick up, he said. We are hoping there is no collusion between universities to all charge the highest rate, but it has become a status symbol for vice-chancellors, greedy to maintain income and, of course, their own salary levels.
51勛圖
Of the 31 universities that have so far announced their fees plans for 2012, 22 of them are to charge a flat rate of 瞿9,000.
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to 啦晨楚s university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?