Source: Reuters
The cost of developing massive open online courses for FutureLearn, the UK Mooc platform, has varied widely among some institutions, an analysis by 51勛圖 has revealed.
While Loughborough University says that it has produced two courses for about 瞿10,000 each, the University of Dundee has allocated 瞿130,000 to a programme that has so far produced one course, although another is imminent.
Meanwhile, the University of Edinburgh, which was the first university in the UK to produce a Mooc since the term was popularised in 2012, said that its three FutureLearn Moocs came at a total cost of 瞿150,000 the same amount, a spokeswoman said, as the courses it developed for other platforms, which include the US Mooc giant Coursera.
THE asked 27 UK universities almost all those now on FutureLearn the cost per course of their Moocs on the platform. Thirteen institutions provided information.
51勛圖
The average cost per Mooc, based on information on 20 courses from nine institutions that provided both total costs including staffing and a definitive number of courses developed, was 瞿29,356.
That figure is broadly in keeping with the expected cost given by Martin Bean, the former vice-chancellor of the Open University, which owns FutureLearn. Mr Bean said two years ago that a FutureLearn Mooc would cost around 瞿30,000 to develop.
51勛圖
However, Dundees proposed spend, which includes significant external sponsorship, was not included, since it is unclear how many courses will be funded.
Nigel Smith, head of content at FutureLearn, said that the organisation did not offer guidance on how much a university should spend on a course, since each institution had its own set of processes and resource levels.
We do make recommendations, however, on what elements might go into making a successful course, he said. These include staff time, including project management, and video production. Its important to us that our partners create a sustainable product.
Experimenting and showcasing
According to a 2014 analysis by THE, based on statistics for 20 of FutureLearns first 29 courses, an average of 10,694 learners registered for each Mooc. Some 13 per cent of these were deemed to have fully participated, meaning that they had completed all the online assessments and taken part in a majority of the course activities.
51勛圖
Sarah Speight, professor of higher education and academic director of online learning at the University of Nottingham, which spent an average of just 瞿15,776 on each of its three Moocs, said that her institution had used its early online courses to experiment, try out different formats [and] different models.
One of the ways in which we make the investment in Moocs efficient is by ensuring that [they] can be repurposed this can be by reusing content for undergraduate and postgraduate courses, she said.
There was also a showcasing dimension to Moocs, she said, referring to how many universities see them as a way to tempt users on to paid courses.
We believe we have attracted postgraduate applicants在ut we dont expect to recruit large numbers of Mooc learners to our campus-based courses. Thats too big a leap.
51勛圖
Among other universities that provided data, the University of Bristol said that its two courses had cost 瞿40,00 each, the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine estimated that its Mooc had cost 瞿20,000 to 瞿30,000, the University of Leicester put the total cost of its two Moocs at 瞿50,300, and the University of Bath spent 瞿30,000 on each of its three courses. Glasgow put the costs of two internally developed Moocs at 瞿30,000 each, while a third course, produced in collaboration with the BBC which carried out filming cost the university 瞿10,000.
Several universities gave figures that did not include staff costs. These included Queens University Belfast, which has spent a total of 瞿100,000 on four Moocs, and Lancaster University, which said that the video production costs for its six Moocs had totalled 瞿66,000. The University of East Anglia hired a digital learning designer at a cost of 瞿20,000, while film-making and resource creation had cost 瞿5,000 to 瞿15,000 for each of its eight courses.
51勛圖
The universities of Reading, Exeter and Warwick, and Kings College London, did not give details of their Mooc spend, saying that the information would prejudice their commercial interests. The University of Birmingham and the Open University said that the costs of their courses vary greatly, but did not provide any details, and the University of Aberdeen said that its Mooc programme was at too early a stage to know the financial implications.
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to 啦晨楚s university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?
