51勛圖

Lib Dems back fees but still aspire to abolition

Amended policy accepts 瞿9,000 charges in short term

Published on
September 19, 2013
Last updated
May 27, 2015

Source: Alamy

Causing protest: many Lib Dem MPs broke pledge to oppose fee rises in 2010

The Liberal Democrats have reached a credible position by accepting 瞿9,000 tuition charges in the short term and treating the abolition of fees as a future aspiration, according to the partys deputy leader, Simon Hughes.

The Lib Dems, who again could be power brokers in any future coalition, reached a compromise over their official policy on higher education funding at the partys autumn conference in Glasgow on 15 September.

Senior Lib Dem figures had originally proposed a motion that backed 瞿9,000 fees and committed the party to retaining the current system of higher education finance.

51勛圖

ADVERTISEMENT

But that was thrown out by delegates, who supported an amended motion.

The changed wording accepts that the 瞿9,000 regime is preferable to Labours policy, adding that the Lib Dems will review the system after the 2015 general election and then scrap fees if possible or necessary.

51勛圖

ADVERTISEMENT

Vince Cable, the business secretary, ended up backing the amended motion while disagreeing with the goal of abolishing fees.

We and the other major parties are not going to go back to free tuition, he told delegates. Even if a party promised it, I dont think the public would believe it.

The Lib Dem leadership wanted to update the partys official policy, which until now stated that it would phase out tuition charges problematic given that many of the partys MPs broke their pledge to oppose fee rises in 2010.

Mr Hughes, who took on the role of access champion in 2011, told TimesHigher Education after the debate: The party still has a strong anti-fees view.

We are trying to be realistic: feeshave been implemented. Were saying that rather than try and go back to where we were [abolishing fees] immediately, lets pause, reflect, take evidence, see the effect and then come back to it again in the round after the election. I think thats amore credible position.

51勛圖

ADVERTISEMENT

Mr Hughes said that on access, it was not the fees在ut the funding for living costs that is the real issue.

As a result of the vote, the Lib Dems are likely to have a short-term higher education funding policy close to that of the Conservatives at the next election.

Labour, which in 2011 unveiled a holding policy promising to lower fees to 瞿6,000, must now weigh up whether maintaining a different stance will attract enough votes to balance the higher costs of implementing such a system.

51勛圖

ADVERTISEMENT

Julian Huppert, the Lib Dem MPfor Cambridge, who voted against 瞿9,000 fees in 2010, told the conference that he wanted an option to eliminate fees kept for consideration by the party in the longer term.

But he added: I really dont think the public would believe us if we said it at the next election.

The original motion proposing support for the 瞿9,000 system was the fruit of a Lib Dem working group on post-16 education policy.

Baroness Brinton, who chaired the working group, criticised the partys former policy to abolish fees. We had no method for paying for it, she told a Million+/National Union of Students fringe event at the conference on 15 September.

51勛圖

ADVERTISEMENT

She added: The groups position was: we quite like the current system provided we get more support forstudents from lower-income backgrounds.

john.morgan@tsleducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT