Research funding that was redistributed to newer universities following the 2008 research assessment exercise will in part be returned to the traditional elite.
A handful of members of the Russell Group of large research-intensive universities, along with some specialist colleges, are the biggest winners in terms of research funding in the 2010-11 grant allocations.
About half of the members of the Russell Group will see above-inflation increases in their recurrent grant for research after the Higher Education Funding Council for England rejigged the 2010-11 funding formula to favour "world-leading" research.
The largest overall rise goes to the University of Oxford, which will have its total research income increased by £7 million (a 6 per cent rise compared with this year). It is followed by University College London and the University of Cambridge, which are both up by more than £4 million (about 4 per cent).
51³Ô¹Ï
To fund these increases, other institutions - particularly newer universities that had "pockets of research excellence" that were rewarded following RAE 2008 - face real-term cuts.
The University of Worcester and Staffordshire University will both lose more than 10 per cent of their research funding, although the overall sums involved are relatively small.
51³Ô¹Ï
As 51³Ô¹Ï has reported, Hefce said that rejigging the funding formula to favour 4* work would "provide an initial step towards increased concentration".
An extra £32 million was added to the total research grant this year to counter the effects of inflation, which Hefce calculated at 2 per cent.
The total sum for 2010-11 is £1.6 billion, of which £1.1 billion is mainstream quality-related research funding.
Overall, the Russell Group universities' share will increase from 62.2 to 62.6 per cent.
51³Ô¹Ï
Other university groupings - the 1994 Group, the University Alliance, Million+ and GuildHE - will all see their pots shrink by small amounts to accommodate the change.
However, not all of the newer members will lose out: the University of Huddersfield will gain £200,000 (up 9.9 per cent), while London Metropolitan University and the University of Bedfordshire both stand to gain more than 6 per cent.
Across the sector, 37 institutions will see higher-than-inflation rises in research funding, while 85 will face real-term losses.
Among the members of the Russell Group that will lose research income are the University of Liverpool, down £448,000 (1.2 per cent), and Newcastle University, down £170,000 (0.5 per cent).
51³Ô¹Ï
| Biggest changes in total research grant funding | ||
| Top five winners and losers in cash terms | ||
| Institution | Total recurrent research funding 2010-11 (£) | Total cash change from 2009-10* |
| University of Oxford | 126,035,8 | 7,132,485 |
| University College London | 108,978,258 | 4,474,222 |
| University of Cambridge | 117,842,931 | 4,172,051 |
| Imperial College London | 95,747,929 | 3,061,151 |
| University of Manchester | 84,617,452 | 2,035,570 |
| Ìý | ||
| University of Bradford | 7,150,706 | -259,772 |
| University of the West of England | 5,808,732 | -282,898 |
| University of East Anglia | 16,129,509 | -303,661 |
| University of Plymouth | 8,388,843 | -350,916 |
| University of Liverpool | 37,618,860 | -448,396 |
| *Excludes transitional quality-related research funding (ie, moderation funding) | ||
• For a full breakdown of research allocations by institution, see related file box on right
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to °Õ±á·¡â€™s university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?