51勛圖

Free speech fears as campus critics denied emeritus status

More transparency needed on how titles are awarded, academics say, as some believe they have lost out after criticising their institution

Published on
November 26, 2025
Last updated
November 26, 2025
Silence please sign at university, UK. To illustrate free speech fears as campus critics are denied emeritus status.
Source: James Whitaker/Alamy

Senior professors denied emeritus status have raised concerns that UK university managers are withholding honorary titles to punish dissent and silence further criticism of institutions, potentially breaching free speech laws.

Several long-serving scholars who have applied for emeritus professor titles, which provide continued access to journals, the library and institutional emails, have told 51勛圖 that their requests had been rejected without explanation despite years of distinguished service.

Having publicly criticised their institution, however, many suspect that such snubs are retribution from senior managers designed to send a message to others nearing retirement.

They want to intimidate potential critics. They want to shut people up and it seems to be working, said one professor recently denied emeritus status despite working for decades at his institution.

51勛圖

ADVERTISEMENT

In one case, the reason for denying the title is more explicit. In an email from a De Montfort University (DMU) executive seen by THE, a university professor was told that, while their behaviour while employed could not be faulted, it is our opinion that your trust and confidence in the leadership of the university is lacking.

It is therefore doubtful that you could continue to represent the university in a positive way and to work in a collaborative manner to further the interests ofDMU, it added, rejecting their application.

51勛圖

ADVERTISEMENT

This may be disappointing to you but advise you that there is no right of appeal, concluded the message.

In a statement to THE, DMU said emeritus status is a discretionary title awarded by the university and there is no entitlement to it upon retirement.

There are many factors which are considered in the awarding of the title, and each individual case is decided on its merits, DMU added.

James Whitley was professor of Mediterranean archaeology at Cardiff University from 2008 until he took voluntary redundancy in May 2025, when the university decided to discontinue ancient history degrees. He was denied an emeritus title despite having worked at the Russell Group university for 35 years.

That unexplained decision has been described as by colleagues, with Whitley arguing that it could be related to his outspoken criticism of recent cuts to humanities degrees at Cardiff and comments made while serving as an academic representative on Cardiffs university council.

Im known for being outspoken at meetings and Ive been highly critical of some high-profile initiatives at Cardiff. But we have laws on academic freedom, which includes the right to critique your own institution, he said.

Denying me emeritus status sends a clear message: if you do not toe the line, we will take away your privileges, said Whitley, who added that this move was not without material consequences for me.

I cannot access my email address, the library or journals, which has made life difficult as I still have book contracts to honour, he continued, noting that many retired academics required such access for their research.

51勛圖

ADVERTISEMENT

51勛圖

ADVERTISEMENT

When you leave a university after a 35-year research career you dont suddenly turn off your brain you still have projects on the go and ideas to pursue, he said.

A Cardiff University spokesperson said no comment could be made on individual cases, adding: An emeritus title is an honorific awarded at the discretion of a university.

There is no entitlement to it upon retirement and each case is considered on its merits.

Another academic told THE that the emeritus professorship that he had held for 14 years had been withdrawn without explanation following criticism of his institutions research strategy.

The university recently changed its statutes to allow the withdrawal of emeritus titles without having to give a reason, even though I have a document stating my emeritus professorship is for life, said the scholar who is appealing the decision and does not want to be named.

Rules over emeritus professorships vary between institutions but their unremunerated nature meant terms and conditionsmight not be as well defined as other university posts, said Wyn Evans, professor of astronomy at the University of Cambridge and founder of the 21 Group, which highlights bullying and harassment in UK higher education.

Rights for retired and emeritus staff are rarely clear or written down, leaving them exposed to the whims of heads of department or human resources, said Evans.

Anyone seen as a troublemaker can be quietly punished losing office space, computing access or other basic services, he continued, adding that such moves were short-sighted as emeritus staff carry wisdom and experience, both academically and in navigating funding and departmental politics.

However, the introduction of the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act 2023, which strengthened aspects of the 1986 Education Act and subsequent 1988 reforms underpinning academic freedom, could make it harder for universities to withhold emeritus titles from employees without providing an explanation, said Dennis Farrington, co-author of The Law of Higher Education (2023).

Professors should not be refused emeritus status simply through exercising legitimate rights to freedom of speech, said Farrington, who urged governing bodies, if they have not already done so, to agree the criteria for award of emeritus status, making it clear that nobody will be denied the status for exercising their right to freedom of speech.

51勛圖

ADVERTISEMENT

Based on the language of the Jenkins clause in the Education Reform Act 1988, members of academic staff enjoy academic freedom, meaning they can express opinions without losing privileges one of which might be the right to be fairly treated when the governing body decides on the question of emeritus status, he added.

jack.grove@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (5)

"When you leave a university after a 35-year research career you dont suddenly turn off your brain you still have projects on the go and ideas to pursue, he said." With respect to Prof. Whitley, I don't think he fully understands what "retirement" actually means. If you've still got book contracts to honour then why retire before you've fulfilled them, without a plan for how you'll complete the work?
I would challenge this comment in the more general sense. "Retirement" has almost lost its meaning, at least for professional people. It's more of a decision about finances, when to take income from your pension funds and other savings etc. There is no statutory retirement age like there was when my parents retired, just a notional "normal retirement age" or NRA, which is currently 67 (but rising!!). I am told that legally the term has no substantive meaning anymore, and that you are only "retired" if that is how you choose to describe your position. It is also not unusual for people who have "retired" in that limited sense to return to work, indeed HM's government is actively encouraging people in that position to return to work in many professions and areas with shortages (especially medicine).For academics, it is perfectly normal to leave a full time paid position involving teaching, administration and research yet continue to work on other temporary or fractional contracts, or to continue to research and work freelance for remuneration. Such pieople may or may not access their pensions. Academics, depending on their situation, may also take a severance deal early if this in in their interests but remain active in the field. Many leading academics continue their research and their connections to University and the University benefits from their work and profile and may well use their publications in the REF. This is very common indeed and we can all think of very many examples (and there are a lot more after the last 2 years). Several high profile Universities will continue to support the research of their Professors Emeritus/Emerita with very generous rooming and budgetary allowances, though others often provide little beyond title, library, and email facilities. Contemporary norms for working, especially for older members of society are very flexible these days and modern living is thankfully much more complex now. On the specific issue of the withholding of honours. This is more difficult and can be political. It might be naive, even stupid, to slag off your University just as you "retire" and then to expect it to grant you academic honours. Such awards should be decided on merit but it is clear for all staff members that the University is not obliged to award these honorary distinctions and may not do so if they believe someone has, in their view (however questionable), damaged the University's reputation. Ultimately, the role of Emeritus is meaningless in a larger sense (as a recent court case in the US proved) and really depends on the discretion, often generosity, of the University in question.
Well yes exactly. Over the last 2 or 3 years so many active and productive researchers have decided to take VSS or some other arrangement and continue their careers as Emeritus or Honorary Research Fellows maintaining. links with their former employer or with another HEI. They may have accessed some or part of their USS entitlement (there are numerous options available which I would encourage colleagues to investigate as one might suit) or not as the case maybe. Many are actively researching, publishing, speaking, examining, broadcasting, reviewing, participating in intellectual debate publicly, etc free of the routine, depressing, mind-numbing constraints of academic administration and the generic, highly micro managed, and often (sad to say) unrewarding teaching and those extensive pastoral duties and are much more productive as a result. I don't think that the scale of this phenomenon has been as yet realized and how this new cadre of researchers and experts will impact on the profile of the profession, especially its research base, as a whole as we gallop towards the deadlines for REF2027 (tho' is that still on hold Sir Patrick?). Many colleagues might choose to "retire" as they or others see it and go off and do things they find more rewarding, cultivating the garden as it were.
Retired academics--emeriti or other title--have long continued to be active professionally. Comment 2 shows no knowledge of professional academic life, or even of essays on this theme in THE. Is it hard to understand that ending teaching and service creates time to write? Etc. Etc. Etc.
new
With the greatest respect to this respondent, I would suggest, that things may well have been different in the US (we are different countries and cultures after all), when the distinguished contributor "retired", but in the UK (and the EU I believe, though I stand to be corrected) we no longer have a category of "retired academic" or "retired" anything else. The comment itself shows absolutely no knowledge (or a very out of date understanding at best) of our professional academic life in the UK in 2025 with the increasing demands of contemporary and pointless academic administration and HR compliance routines (most of which will postdate his experience), what the contributor satirically describes as academic service, or indeed, the very many and frequent discussions and laments in THES on these subjectsband is characteristrically and (to my mind) uncessarily dismissive of those who may have a slight disagreement with their position.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT