51³Ō¹Ļ

Biden wins two court rulings on student loan forgiveness

Federal judge finds states don’t have standing to challenge debt cancellation, while Supreme Court justice sets aside emergency appeal

Published on
October 21, 2022
Last updated
October 21, 2022
The Supreme Court of the United States building Washington, D.C.
Source: iStock

The Biden administration has won two preliminary victories in the defence of its student loan forgiveness programme, including a favourable ruling from a conservative Supreme Court justice.

Just as the programme granting up to $20,000 (Ā£18,000) in federal student loan debt cancellation takes effect, Justice Amy Coney Barrett denied an emergency application from a taxpayer group in Wisconsin seeking to block it.

Separately, in a potentially more substantive case, a federal judge in Missouri dismissed outright a similar attempt by six Republican-led states, saying the states lacked the necessary legal standing.

President Joe BidenĀ outlined the planĀ in August, largely fulfilling a promise during the 2020 presidential campaign to tackle a nationwide accumulation of student debt estimated at more than $1.6 trillion among some 43 million borrowers.

51³Ō¹Ļ

ADVERTISEMENT

Republicans and even some Democrats have raised concern over the budgetary cost, the randomness of the benefit, and the risk it might fuel higher college costs while aiding peopleĀ who don’t need it.

One of the most vocal critics in Congress, Virginia Foxx, the top-ranking Republican on the House Committee on Education and Labor, promised the court rulings would not mark the end of the matter.

51³Ō¹Ļ

ADVERTISEMENT

ā€œThis is an illegal action and there are multiple pending lawsuits,ā€ Ms Foxx saidĀ .

The leader of the six-state coalition, Leslie Rutledge, the attorney general of Arkansas,Ā Ā ā€œwill immediately appeal this decisionā€ by US District Judge Henry Autrey – like Justice Barrett, a Republican appointee. The other states joining Arkansas in the case are Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska and South Carolina.

Federal law is understood to let the president grant such benefits in an emergency, though opponents have challenged Mr Biden’s reliance on Covid asĀ sufficient circumstancesĀ at this point in the pandemic. Such opponents, however, have been described as struggling for weeks to find a plaintiff that could legally present a claim of harm to a court.

The Wisconsin claim was brought on behalf of a group known as the Brown County Taxpayers Association. Justice Barrett’s rejection of its request appeared not to involve the entire Supreme Court.

51³Ō¹Ļ

ADVERTISEMENT

The legal rulings on the matter in favour of the administration came two days after Mr Biden held a White House ceremony toĀ celebrate the student loan forgiveness programmeĀ by formally announcing the opening of a government website to process the claims.

ā€œThis is a game-changer for millions of Americans,ā€Ā . ā€œWe had over 10,000 people contact the White House and be – either send us letters or calls thanking us.ā€

paul.basken@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT