51³Ô¹Ï

A disastrous open-access policy lashes the promise of the digital age to an outmoded buggy of a model, laments Martin McQuillan

A series of high-profile research scandals within social psychology have led to unjustified attacks on the whole academic discipline. Wolfgang Stroebe and Miles Hewstone declare that the majority must not suffer for a tiny minority¡¯s misconduct

Universities and research institutes that do not investigate research misconduct properly could have their research council funding removed.

Religious sense ¡®cover-up¡¯ in emphasis on embryonic work

Critics say university¡¯s announcement should have gone out to peer review, not a press conference

Retiree challenges UEA v-c in tribunal hearing over FoI requests. David Matthews reports

The government has agreed to introduce an exemption to the Freedom of Information Act to prevent the premature disclosure of research data.

Professor says he was suspended by Sheffield for mentioning a touchy subject. Paul Jump writes

Research misconduct accounts for a much higher proportion of retractions in biomedical literature than previously believed, a new study has concluded.

A renowned immunologist whose life was turned upside down when it emerged that one of his postdoctoral researchers had falsified experimental results tells Paul Jump that the sector needs a culture change if it is to fulfil its duty to expose research misconduct

Unlike our major competitors, the UK has avoided a major research misconduct scandal over the past decade, but unless the government and the academy shake off their complacency, we won¡¯t be ready when it is our turn to suffer, argues Michael Farthing

Research funders¡¯ long-awaited ¡°concordat¡± on research integrity deliberately steers clear of ¡°heavy-handed regulation¡±, one of its authors has said.

The UK Research Integrity Office has welcomed calls for it to be placed at the centre of a toughened research integrity oversight regime in the UK.

Bullying and fear of being fired may deter staff from lifting lid on scientific misconduct. Jack Grove writes

Research misconduct is ¡°alive and well¡± at UK universities, the British Medical Journal has claimed.

Another paper authored by University of Manchester professor Sylvia Bulfone-Paus has been retracted ¨C but this one does not feature the Russian postdoctoral researchers blamed for misconduct that led to a string of retractions earlier this year.

Dutch begin documenting top psychologist¡¯s supermassive fraud

The government and the research councils have rejected suggestions that the UK needs a specific body to police research integrity.

Miles Hewstone discusses a heinous data-faking scandal and the lessons that must be learned to stop the ¡®betrayers of the truth¡¯

Analysis reveals higher rates of withdrawn research papers for top science journals. Paul Jump reports

MPs want to see a more robust and transparent peer-review process. Paul Jump writes

The UK needs an independent regulator to oversee research integrity, a committee of MPs has concluded.

UKRIO, set up to ensure probity in research, needs funds - but some can¡¯t see a role for it, writes Paul Jump

Lab laments after order mix-up leaves it no choice but to retract journal paper. Paul Jump writes

51³Ô¹Ï ethics guidelines set out researchers¡¯ duties to be clear and above board, writes Paul Jump

Personal testimony and anecdote enliven a text on a vital subject, writes Michael Farthing

Voluntary guidelines unveiled to help journal editors decide when to withdraw work. Zo? Corbyn reports

China is hungry for Western-style universities, not least to fuel its economy. Phil Baty reports on the efforts to uproot corruption and bureaucracy and build a dynamic and vibrant world-class system

¡®Publish or perish¡¯ factor in withdrawal of science papers. Zoe Corbyn reports