51勛圖

Every student must study both STEM and the arts and humanities

Wider talent creation will better serve both businesses and graduates as the tech revolution drives rapid economic change, says Hanifa Shah

Published on
November 13, 2025
Last updated
November 13, 2025
People look at the "Vitruvian Man" a drawing by Leonardo da Vinci, illustrating the combination of arts and science
Source: GABRIEL BOUYS/Staff/Getty Images

The Russell Group was right to insist, in the wake of the UK governments recent Post-16 Education and White Paper, that humanities graduates have an important role to play in fulfilling the industrial strategy.

In an article in 51勛圖, the groups policy manager, Charlotte Hallahan, reported analysis revealing that 85 per cent of non-STEM graduates from high-tariff, research-intensive universities enter one of the governments for growth within five years of completing their first degrees. As she noted, even high tech start-ups not only need the scientists or engineers who make the technical breakthroughs, but a whole range of legal, creative, strategic and critical thinking skills which education provides.

But as human-machine synergies accelerate discovery, product development and social change, wouldnt it be better to have graduates whose expertise spanned both STEM and SHAPE disciplines? AI and other digital systems are set to move from being mere tools to joining us as co-creators, analysts and even decision partners. This raises the stakes when it comes to ethical and security implications. The speed at which biosynthetic development takes place has created concerns about biosafety, for instance.

The more of ourselveswe put into technological systems, the more exposed we become cybercrime, for instance, costs the UK economy in excess of 瞿30 billion a year. Having the technological knowledge is valuable but needs to be coupled with critical thinking and wider social and ethical framing.

51勛圖

ADVERTISEMENT

Multinational corporations have already begun to respond to these developments, a US-wide initiative to train workers and small businesses in AI. However, universities have the opportunity to prioritise wider talent creation, which will still serve business, innovation and the economy.

Such a workforce will also be more future-proof and responsive because the accelerated pace of technological change is also likely to increase the rate at which skills, especially individual specialisms, become outdated. Modern graduates need multiple strings to their bows.

51勛圖

ADVERTISEMENT

STEAM is the purposeful integration of science, technology, engineering, the arts and humanities and mathematics (I hold the view that the A stands for both arts and humanities). This is no mere fad but a very real and necessary evolution in how we understand and shape knowledge and, as a consequence, the creative and cultural industries.

By embedding interdisciplinary opportunities into degree pathways, students can move fluidly between analytical and imaginative modes of thinking, a skill set increasingly demanded by employers across sectors. Equipping them with wide-ranging knowledge and multiple skills while also demonstrating the relationship between different disciplines can spark new understanding and solutions to problems by helping them ask critical questions, consider ethical implications and bring meaning and context to innovation.

For example, in their degree, and then in the job market, an engineering student requires critical thinking more than ever. And an arts student now needs high levels of digital competence. The boundaries between disciplines have become increasingly porous.

My new role as the UKs first pro vice-chancellor for STEAM is therefore not about symbolic advocacy. It is about systemically embedding and reimagining the way STEAM is woven into traditional education.

51勛圖

ADVERTISEMENT

At Birmingham City University, students from all disciplines are already being exposed to both STEM and the arts and humanities. But we will go further. We are reviewing and revising the entire curriculum across the university so that every undergraduate degree includes a first-year module with a learning outcome that revolves around defining the basic principles of STEAM. Moreover, every student will complete at least oneassignment that requires them to solve challenges in a directly interdisciplinary way.

And rather than offering optional modules outside their discipline, as is common across the sector, the second year will see students enrolled on a cross-departmental collaborative module that embeds STEAM principles in their subject area. Whats more, no matter their degree, all students will be able to apply for a new venture capital fund supporting innovation and enterprise that bridges fields.

The aim of these steps is to equip students with technical expertise, creative confidence and the ability to see and think critically.Industry is no longer asking for graduates who can simply code or calculate: employees need to collaborate across disciplines, communicate complex ideas and adapt to volatile and shifting contexts. These are competencies deeply rooted in the arts and humanities. So, too, is imagination, which is essential for entrepreneurship that is both commercially viable and socially conscious.

The transformative potential of STEAM is perhaps most evident in the realm of AI. Far from being just a technical tool for STEM, AI is also a cultural phenomenon. As we introduce students to the possibilities it affords, we must ground their learning in ethical reasoning, human-centred design and societal impact by drawing on the arts and humanities not least cultural studies and philosophy.

51勛圖

ADVERTISEMENT

By making these connections visible and actionable through real-world projects, innovation labs and interdisciplinary teaching, we can create a more sustainable workforce that can transform society for the better.

is pro vice-chancellor for research, enterprise, engagement and STEAM at Birmingham City University.

51勛圖

ADVERTISEMENT

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (7)

no mention of the many many articles and books arguing for a broad, integrated, cross- or interdisciplinary curriculum. A pale pretense of originality. Why> At least as important: what about the likely near majority of graduates who will not have or desire a career in STEM?
ENOUGH , yet another author bleating the drivel that STEM students must havw exposure to SHAPE in order to have "creative confidence". utter NONSENSE, most STEM activities from applied projects in engineering through to research in pure mathematics require students to exercise imagination and creative flair in working on the topic. onre gets the impression that the shape mafia are desparately grasping for any straw to try to make themselves appear relevant as students continue to vote wit their feet and travel in other directions. understandable but tedious and grasping at "AI" is likely to only hasyen the upcoming defenestration.
Yes, STEAM is a better approach overall. Scientists need to know history, foreign languages, and their own language so they can communicate. Everyone should be singing and have a musical instrument, a recreational sport, a chance to get outdoors, and a craft so they can support themselves in case of need. A strong general education program is needed everywhere. It's not a frill. AI cannot replace any of this: it is a bubble already bursting. Some intelligent skepticism upstairs would be in order.
But it seems to me when we talk about the interdisciplinary aspect and AH students taking STEM subjects, we are usually referring to the more general, popular end of the spectrum which is more Humanities premised anyway. We are not talking about nucleur physics but the popularisation of science or the history of scientce very much in a Humanities style narrative. Thomas Kuhn writes about science but from the perspective of analyzing "paradigms" rather than dealing with scientific research. Watching our old friend, Prof Cox, simpering smugly on about the Universe and the Big Bang is mildly engaging, but that's really about public education rather than scientific research isn't it? Yes of course we all will have to engage with AI and other Tech developments but that's not really "doing STEM" is it? To do STEM properly one would need, I imagine, some science A levels and to be working at a very specialised level. And we don't really need to understand the science of AI to be able to discuss the wider ethical and cultural issues it raises. I thought that interdisciplinarity is actually the deployment of different disciplines in a coherent complementary methodology within a field of enquiry, not just "doing" a STEM module alongside a AH module? In effect changing the field or object of knowledge. I discussed this with expert in medicine recently and commented that medics don't actually seem to be interested in the history of medicine as such and have allowed the Humanities to take over this area (I am not sure I was entirely right here). He said, maybe but in his field the number of specialist medical papers that came out was quite overwhelming and needed all his time just keeping up with them, let alone researching and writing about the history and culture of the subject. But yes of course, intelligent people with enquiring minds will always find fascinating things fascinating whether they are STEM, SHAPE, STEAM etc etc. So in my opinion (and after all, it is the one that counts), this all seems very wishy washy.
The bifurcation into STEM or SHAPE is a by-product of how UK universities are organised, with students applying to study a "course" in a department that might or might not include opportunities for taking material from other departments. My peers and I went through a system where we applied to a faculty; Graduation required gaining X credits from material in that faculty, beyond that you were free to take whatever material you wanted [provided you met topic-level pre-requisites]. Some students did, some did not no-pressure either way. It makes admin more complicated [timetables & exams], but it was do-able even in the 80s. Some topics died a natural death from lack of interest, new material appeared to fill in the gaps; it might not make a difference to the contemporary sustainability issues; however it would answer the breadth vs depth issues raised in the article, whilst allowing students to vote with their feet.The UK model is a consequence of choices made decades ago and carried on by intellectual inertia.
The 'M' is too often neglected. Without A level mathematics, or an equivalent, on entry, this is pie in the sky.
new
1. STEm, STEAM, STEAMM are meaningless slogans 2. STEMM is unadmittedly repetitive. Is not mathematics a "science"? 3. None of this is "interdisciplinarity." Lumping or listing disciplines is NOT interdisciplinary or cross-disciplinary 4. there is an important literature going back to 1960: begin with Thomas S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Continue to Harvey Graff's Undisciplining Knowledge (2015), and, and, any 5. stop sloganeering esp. university administrators!

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT