51³Ō¹Ļ

Racial critique of Supreme Court pick imperils Georgetown posting

Conservative’s appointment as constitutional studies chief derailed over demeaning Biden plan for black female Supreme Court nominee

Published on
February 2, 2022
Last updated
February 2, 2022
Georgetown University
Source: iStock

Georgetown University has suspended – and is facing student demands that itĀ fire – aĀ conservative law expert who criticised Joe Biden’s promise toĀ appoint aĀ black woman to the USĀ Supreme Court.

The scholar, Ilya Shapiro, had suggested on Twitter that MrĀ Biden choose an Indian-born federal judge, SriĀ Srinivasan, for the top court and lamented that the president’s campaign promise meant that the nation would get a ā€œlesser black womanā€.

The Black Law Students Association at Georgetown with more than calling for Mr Shapiro to be fired, and some students staged aĀ  at the law school to reinforce the message. More than 150 faculty from universities across the US backing Mr Shapiro.

The Georgetown law dean, William Treanor, met with students, called Mr Shapiro’s postings on the matter ā€œappallingā€, and during the suspension of whether he violated university conduct policies and should face further repercussions.

51³Ō¹Ļ

ADVERTISEMENT

ā€œRacial stereotypes about individual capabilities and qualifications remain a pernicious force in our society and our profession,ā€ Professor Treanor said in a message to the Georgetown law community. ā€œIĀ am keenly aware that our law school isĀ not exempt.ā€

The dean acted just one day before Mr Shapiro, the outgoing head of constitutional studies at the Cato Institute, a libertarian thinktank, was due to become a senior lecturer and executive director of the Georgetown Center for the Constitution.

51³Ō¹Ļ

ADVERTISEMENT

Along with his Twitter posting about a ā€œlesser black womanā€, Mr Shapiro said a Supreme Court justice chosen only from among black women ā€œwill always have an asterisk attachedā€.

As the controversy erupted, Mr Shapiro removed those postings and added new entries in which , saying, ā€œIĀ meant noĀ offence, but it was an inartful tweet.ā€ : ā€œI’m optimistic that Georgetown’s investigation will be fair, impartial and professional, though there’s really not much to investigate.ā€

At a point in the 2020 presidential campaign when Mr Biden needed a key endorsement, he promised that he would appoint a black woman to the Supreme Court if he got the chance. He reiterated that commitment in recent days after current Justice Stephen Breyer announced his planned retirement.

The Black Law Students Association, in its petition, said Mr Shapiro ā€œhas a history of publicly discounting and degrading women of colourā€, including Sonia Sotomayor, another current Supreme Court justice.

51³Ō¹Ļ

ADVERTISEMENT

Mr Shapiro’s comments ā€œwere not just inartfulā€, the petitioners said. ā€œThey were offensive, sexist, racist, misogynistic, inflammatory, deplorable, insensitive and unprofessional.ā€

The faculty petition supporting Mr Shapiro was organised by the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, a group that calls itself non-partisan but regularly promotes the argument popular among conservatives that US higher education suffers from widespread and excessive restraints on free speech.

Its petition contended that Mr Shapiro, in using the phrase ā€œlesser black womanā€, apparently meant to say that the Supreme Court would get ā€œa less-qualifiedā€ black woman.

ā€œBut setting aside that one mistake – which should not be seen as a fireable offense – the substance of the message, which is that Sri Srinivasan is the most qualified progressive nominee, and that it’s wrong for the president to pass him over because of race and sex, is a position that is most certainly protected by academic freedom principles,ā€ said the faculty petitioners, hailing overwhelmingly from outside of Georgetown.

51³Ō¹Ļ

ADVERTISEMENT

The sit-in protest by Georgetown law students led to an hour-long meeting with Professor Treanor. The students said they told the dean that the law school’s ā€œinability to draw a bold line between conservatism and racism has come at the expense of our black studentsā€. They also said the law school ā€œlacks the institutional safeguards to protect its black students from threats inside of and outside of the classroomā€.

paul.basken@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT